Difference between revisions of "Medical WSNs"
From Cyber-Physical Systems Laboratory
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Groups) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
= Groups = | = Groups = | ||
| − | * [http://www.cs.virginia.edu/wsn/medical/ University of Virginia] | + | * [http://www.cs.virginia.edu/wsn/medical/ University of Virginia]: Alarm-NET |
| + | * Intel Research Seattle | ||
| + | * University of Washington | ||
| + | * University of Rochester | ||
| + | * Harvard University | ||
= Systems = | = Systems = | ||
Revision as of 21:40, 11 January 2008
Challenges
- reliability
- privacy and security
- power management - not all devices are battery powered
- diversity - both a challenge and an opportunity
Medical devices
Groups
- University of Virginia: Alarm-NET
- Intel Research Seattle
- University of Washington
- University of Rochester
- Harvard University
Systems
Alarm-NET
- Domain: assisted living, circadian activity rhythms
- Network architecture:
- Devices: heterogeneous - motes, PDAs and PCs
- Sensors:
- medical: pulse, blood oxygenaton
- non-medical: temperature, light, infrared motion
References:
- A. Wood, G. Virone, T. Doan, Q. Cao, L. Selavo, Y. Wu, L. Fang, Z. He, S. Lin, J. Stankovic, “ALARM-NET: Wireless Sensor Networks for Assisted-Living and Residential Monitoring,” Technical Report
